👋 Welcome to the third issue of The Great Debate, where every week we throw today’s spiciest questions into the ring to punch with arguments. One question. Two sides. You decide.
🥊 Today’s Debate:
Should remote work be the new normal?
📚 Context:
In 2020, as the COVID lockdown happened, the world’s biggest experiment in remote work began. Millions of people swapped cubicles for kitchen tables, offices for Zoom screens, and commutes for sweatpants.
6 years later, the question remains unresolved: should we ever go back?
One side sees liberation, like better work-life balance, access to global talent, and proof that productivity doesn't require pants (or at least, not visible ones). The other sees isolation, eroding company culture, and junior employees missing out on the mentorship that happens in hallways, not Slack channels.
As companies from Zoom to JPMorgan drag employees back to the office, the debate is far from settled: is remote work the future of productivity or a temporary glitch in how humans work best?
🔵 Side A:
Yes: Work Is What You Do, Not Where You Sit
Remote work has evolved from a crisis solution into a smarter, more efficient way to build companies. It boosts productivity, widens opportunity, and lets people work where they thrive, not where their boss’s lease happens to be.
And few founders embody this shift more than Tyler Denk, co-founder and CEO of beehiiv:
“We hire the absolute best person for the job, regardless of where they live. In a world of 8 billion people, it’s naive to think the top hire lives near your HQ,” he says.
“The money our competitors spend on office leases, we put into growth. The flexibility keeps people happy, the reach expands our talent pool, and the results speak for themselves.”
And the data backs it up: SHRM research shows that hybrid and remote teams reduce quit rates by 35%. In today’s economy, flexibility means evolution, not compromise.
Stanford economist Nicholas Bloom ran a groundbreaking study 1 in 2013 showing remote workers were 13% more productive than their office counterparts. They took fewer breaks, fewer sick days, and reported higher job satisfaction.
GitLab, a fully remote company valued at $6 billion, proves you can scale without offices. Their philosophy is simple: hire the best talent anywhere, communicate asynchronously, measure results over hours logged. No commute time wasted, no geographic limits on hiring, no pretending to look busy.
Sara Sutton, CEO of FlexJobs and World Economic Forum Young Global Leader, points out that remote work benefits everyone involved, from families enjoying more balance to companies cutting costs and emissions. Wade Foster, CEO of Zapier, built a globally distributed team that hires the best talent regardless of location, while Tammy Bjelland of Workplaceless helps organizations thrive through remote training and culture-building.
👉 In short: Remote work delivers better productivity, wider opportunity, and environmental benefits. The question is why we are still living in the 20th century and pretending offices are necessary.
🔴 Side B:
No: Offices Build Careers, Remote Work Builds Isolation
Microsoft's annual Work Trend Index analyzed 61,000 employees and found something troubling: remote work shrank collaboration networks and weakened cross-team connections. Workers became more siloed, with fewer "weak ties”, like those casual hallway conversations that spark innovation and unexpected opportunities.
Apple CEO Tim Cook put it bluntly in 2021:
"Innovation isn't always a planned activity. It's bumping into each other over the course of the day and advancing an idea that you just had."2
Junior employees pay the highest price. Harvard Business Review research showed entry-level remote workers received 25% less mentorship and experienced slower career progression. To learn how to become a great leader, you need to be in the room when decisions get made and observe how experienced colleagues navigate conflict and politics.
Then there's the mental health toll. The American Psychiatric Association found that 67% of remote workers reported feeling lonely, and rates of anxiety and depression climbed among long-term remote employees. Humans didn't evolve to collaborate through rectangles on screens.
And let's be honest: remote work often means "always on" culture. Buffer's State of Remote Work survey revealed 27% of remote workers struggle to unplug, with blurred boundaries between work and life making burnout worse, not better.
👉 In short: Careers are built on relationships, innovation needs friction, and loneliness isn't a perk, so clearly, the office still matters. People need human connection offline.
⚖️ Now It’s Your Turn:
Who made the stronger case? Cast your vote below!
💬 Do you also want to share your argument on this topic? Share your thoughts on the voting page or add your comment to this topic’s post on our website by clicking Read Online on the top of this email.
💰 Be my George Soros. Be my Peter Thiel. Be my mysterious mega-donor.
My mission is simple: make debates civil, smart, and (yes) sexy again. This newsletter is just the opening argument. But to grow it into a movement, I need fuel.
If you believe strong opinions deserve a good stage, support the cause by buying me a coffee (or, if you’re feeling Soros-level generous, a whole Starbucks franchise).
Thanks for your vote & for growing the opinion market!
See you next week with another hot debate.
✌️ Máté - The Great Debate
1 Bloom, Nicholas, et al. "Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment." The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2015. Link: https://nbloom.people.stanford.edu/sites/g/files/sbiybj4746/f/wfh.pdf
2 Source: https://people.com/human-interest/apple-ceo-tim-cook-expects-return-to-office-post-pandemic/
